- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:52:40 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6158 David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |David_E3@VERIFONE.com --- Comment #2 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2009-01-05 16:52:40 --- On 2009-01-05 DE responded to Axel Dahmen. The actual email is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2009Jan/0003.html. The text follows: Dear Mr. Dahmen: Thanks very much for your careful reading of our specification, and for your suggestion about changing the way we handle the defining and declaring of attributes within complex type definitions. On October 17, 2009, the WG discussed the issue. The relevant points from the discussion were: - some WG members are very sympathetic with improving the syntax to make it more intuitive, or at least less counter intuitive. - relaxing the spec to allow attributes to appear at the beginning of complex types would break backward compatibility. - changing the spec to allow attributes to appear anywhere in the complex type definition is controversial with some WG members, since "unordered" does not mean "no order" - it often means the order may vary, but the actual document order is significant in each document instance. For this case, document order would not be significant. - changing the complexType declaration is may be overtaken by a more compact syntax. Putting these points into a meaninful sentence: while some WG members are sympathetic, the actual implementation as described would be controversial, and in any case may be overtaken with the "compact syntax" discussions that the WG plans to have after the publication of XML Schema 1.1. So the WG would like to mark this issue as LATER. Please let us know if you accept our resolution. Thanks again for your comments. Best regards, David Ezell, chair XML Schema WG On behalf of the XML Schema WG -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2009 16:52:49 UTC