- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:00:20 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5167
Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|resolved |needsReview
--- Comment #6 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-05-27 03:00:19 ---
In response to comment #5:
> 3.17.2.2 (...) says fragments will not work.
I think this is referring to the following sentence in 3.17.2.2:
"This means that simple fragment identifiers using these names will not work to
reference schema components from outside the context of schema documents."
Note that
1. It's not "fragments will not work", but "simple fragments using *names* (not
IDs) will not work".
2. Fragments can be used to refer to schema components. See the last paragraph
in 3.17.2.2.
3. This is only about references to schema components, and not schema
documents.
> The phrase containing change 2 now reads:
> perhaps referenced using fragment and/or [XPointer] notation.
>
> This seems inconsistent with 3.17.2.2.
The above cited sentence is in section 4.3.1, about how to locate schema
documents (<xs:schema> elements). This is a different case from 3.17.2.2. Here
<xs:schema> elements can be located using fragments.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 03:00:29 UTC