- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 17:59:59 +0530
- To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Hi Pete,
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com> wrote:
> That would cover 90% of the problems I see people having with XSD today. An
> XSD 1.2 (or something new) could then add additional features such as
> xs:assert and so on.
I agree to most of your points.
But I feel, having xs:assert significantly improves capability to
define quite complex validation constraints, which were almost
impossible to do in XSD 1.0. xs:assert is a very straightforward
concept to be understood by users, and WG being able to provide it in
XSD 1.1 is I feel, a great addition to the spec.
for e.g., please consider something like below:
<xs:assert test="@min le @max" />
OR
<xs:assert test="@dob gt xs:date('2005-10-10')" />
If we exploit the full power of XPath 2.0, we can write much complex
validation rules,
for e.g.
<xs:assert test="@x = count(for $x in .//* .. something)" />
IMHO, producing such significant additions (like xs:assert) after many
years of WG efforts is a good deliverable.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 12:31:04 UTC