- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:04:12 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6911 --- Comment #3 from Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com> 2009-05-15 10:04:11 --- I agree there are a number of potential audiences for such documentation, and it's hard to decide which audience should have priority. Like Innovimax I think the ideal case would be to have something like an xs:errorMessage element, e.g.: <xs:complexType name="intRange"> <xs:attribute name="min" type="xs:int"/> <xs:attribute name="max" type="xs:int"/> <xs:assert test="@min le @max"> <xs:errorMessage> The value of the min attribute must be less than or equal to that of the max attribute. </xs:errorMessage> </xs:assert> </xs:complexType> As you can see I'm not sure whether this should be a child of xs:annotation or just xs:assert, because I'm not sure it makes sense in all cases where xs:annotation is used (haven't checked). I imagine this sort of thing would have been easy to add 6 months ago, but maybe we're past that point. So Michael's suggestion not to include any particular recommendations with regard to this and leave the community to develop conventions would seem to be the best we can do at this stage. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 10:04:20 UTC