- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:50:09 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 --- Comment #8 from jboyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> 2009-05-11 23:50:09 --- (In reply to comment #7) > The changes agreed upon at yesterday's call have been made in the status-quo > version of the spec at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.html > (member-only link) > I have unilaterally applied the same wording change to the corresponding > sentence in the description of negativeInteger (which must similarly be > non-zero). > Accordingly, I'm marking this issue resolved. It would be helpful if John > Boyer, as the originator of the issue, could close it to indicate your assent, > or reopen it to indicate dissent. If we don't hear otherwise from you in the > next two weeks, we'll assume you are happy. The wording itself looks good to me. I've noticed, though, that somehow this issue was tagged as a Schema 1.1 only issue, whereas my original post [1] stated an erratum for Schema 1.0, which would of course also need to be applied to 1.1. This means that fixing only 1.1 does not fix [1]. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2009JanMar/0189.html It's not clear how to change the status of the issue; I'll try a few more things after committing this comment to see if the way to change the status presents itself. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 23:50:19 UTC