- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 15:30:35 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2521 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com Keywords| |needsReview --- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-05-09 15:30:34 --- A proposal to resolve this issue by numbering all grammar productions has been placed on the server at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b2521.html [member-only link] This proposal has not been reviewed by the other editors and does not necessarily carry editorial consensus. (In particular, it runs directly counter to the solution offered in comment 1.) For technical reasons (the numbers in question are generated by the stylesheet) the actual changes are not marked in color. A search for the string "::=" in the status quo document and the proposal will illustrate the changes. The production rule for stringRep in section 3.3.12, for example, reads, in the status quo: Lexical Space stringRep ::= Char* /* (as defined in [XML]) */ In the change proposal, it reads Lexical Space [1] stringRep ::= Char* /* (as defined in [XML]) */ My experience as a reader is that the number of grammar productions is helpful, so I do not wish to adopt the proposal in comment 1 to suppress them for all productions. On the contrary, I think it is a modest improvement in the spec to number the other productions in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 9 May 2009 15:30:44 UTC