[Bug 6707] [Schema Comment] Erratum for lexical representation for positiveInteger

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6707


Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davep@iit.edu




--- Comment #5 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu>  2009-05-08 12:39:03 ---
Proposal:

In 3.4 (Other Built-in Datatypes), after the paragraph beginning "This section
gives", add a new paragraph:

"Each of the atomic datatypes described ibelow has a ·lexical mapping· which is
a subset the ·lexical mapping· of its ·base type·, determined by the defining
facets.  The descriptions below of the resulting value space and ·lexical
space· are only approximations, and, if taken alone, may well not exactly
describe  the real value space and/or lexical space of the derived datatype,
which are in fact the domain and range of the ·lexical mapping· so restricted."

In 3.4.25.1, at the end of the first sentence add ", one of which must be
non-zero".


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 12:39:12 UTC