- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:27:09 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6697 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER --- Comment #3 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-04-18 01:27:09 --- The XML Schema WG discussed this issue during this morning's telcon. We thank the XSL and XML Query WGs for reiterating the importance of this question and ensuring that it is not lost track of. The XML Schema WG remains committed to the plan we agreed on with the QT working groups in June 2007 and recorded in comment 2 of bug 3120 (http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3120#c2): we plan to mark precisionDecimal as a feature at risk in our Candidate Recommendation, and the exit criteria for CR will include not only implementations in the context of XSD 1.1, but also the general state of industry uptake, and the state of the IEEE documents. (The IEEE documents, as it happens, have now been published as final documents, so that might be regarded as having been overtaken by events.) Since we expect to take up the issue raised in this bug report when we progress XSD 1.1 from CR to PR, we are accordingly closing this issue as LATER. Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next ten days or so, we will assume you agree with the WG decision. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 April 2009 01:27:21 UTC