- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:54:41 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5781 David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |David_E3@VERIFONE.com Keywords|editorial, needsReview |decided --- Comment #5 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2009-04-17 16:54:41 --- 5781: identity constraint rules refer to 'node sets' - should be 'node sequences' http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b5781.html Summary: issue requests that we align our terminology with QT's by saying 'sequence' not 'set'. There has been discussion; SG opposes most of the change. MSM's recommendation: fairly quick. - Amend the proposal by substituting 'set' for 'sequence' passim, EXCEPT in the phrase "nodes for which all the {fields} evaluate to a node sequence". Note that for the most part, this amounts to reverting the proposal. (It turns into a proposal for changing one instance of 'set' to 'sequence' and rephrasing a definition.) - Adopt as amended. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 16:54:50 UTC