- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:41:11 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6553 David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|editorial, needsReview |decided --- Comment #10 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2009-04-17 16:41:11 --- 6553: XML 1.0 and 1.1 references are inconsistent http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b6553.html http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b6553.html To WG 12 April 2009. 6553 XML 1.0 and 1.1 references are inconsistent Summary: WG decided to: (1) Use undated links, not dated links, to W3C specs. (2) Give document status and date ("W3C Working Draft, 35 March 2013"). (3) Add text to normative references to W3C specs saying "The edition cited is the one current at the date of publication of this specification. Implementations may follow the edition cited and/or any later edition(s); it is implementation-defined which." Note: Proposal does NOT make the sentence in (3) a blanket statement but added to individual references; should be a case by case decision. Did NOT add it to non-normative references. Did NOT apply decision to submissions (which are not W3C documents. Did NOT fix other problems in the references. Some discussion in Bugzilla; amendments needed. MSM's recommendation: quick. - Mark various undated links as additions, as specified in comment 7. - Correct the URI for XPointer as specified in comment 8 (see ammendment "and/or" -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 16:41:21 UTC