- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:51:22 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6522
David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|editorial, needsReview |decided
--- Comment #21 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2009-04-17 15:51:21 ---
- 6522 (John Cowan): Please un-deprecate the the namespace
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatype
The proposal is at:
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b6522.html
Summary: reverts most of the earlier change that deprecated the
namespace. After this change, the relevant part of 3.1 will
read:
To facilitate usage in specifications other than the XML
Schema definition language, such as those that do not want to
know anything about aspects of the XML Schema definition
language other than the datatypes, each ·built-in· datatype
is also defined in the namespace whose URI is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes
Note: The status quo says "each non-special built-in datatype
...:, We added 'non-special' when we deprecated the namespace,
probably on the theory that (1) anySimpleType is not in the
namespace as described in 1.0 and (2) if we were going to
deprecate it, it made no sense to 'maintain' it or bring it up to
date. I propose to revert the change for simplicity: "all
built-ins" is simpler than "all non-special built-ins". Reliable
authority says RelaxNG doesn't care and can live with specials in
the namespace or not in the namespace.
MSM's recommendation: Quick. Adopt proposal as shipped.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 15:51:35 UTC