- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:14:17 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2632 --- Comment #6 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-04-16 21:14:16 --- Here is a proposal for the desired clarification. (1) In 3.3.1 of Structures, in the paragraph beginning "{value constraint}", change the sentence which now reads If a {value constraint} with {variety} = default is present, and if the element being ·validated· is empty, then the element is treated as if {value constraint}.{lexical form} was used as the content of the element. to read If a {value constraint} with {variety} = default is present, and if the element being ·validated· is empty, then for purposes of calculating the [schema normalized value] and other contributions to the post-schema-validation information set, the element is treated as if {value constraint}.{lexical form} was used as the content of the element. (2) Before the existing Note following that parargraph insert a second Note: Note: when a default value is supplied and used, as described in the second sentence of the preceding paragraph, the default value is used to calculate the [schema normalized value], etc., but the actual content of the element is not changed: the element was empty in the input information set, and it remains empty in the PSVI. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2009 21:14:30 UTC