- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:14:17 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
--- Comment #6 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-04-16 21:14:16 ---
Here is a proposal for the desired clarification.
(1) In 3.3.1 of Structures, in the paragraph beginning "{value
constraint}", change the sentence which now reads
If a {value constraint} with {variety} = default is present,
and if the element being ·validated· is empty, then the
element is treated as if {value constraint}.{lexical form}
was used as the content of the element.
to read
If a {value constraint} with {variety} = default is present,
and if the element being ·validated· is empty, then for
purposes of calculating the [schema normalized value] and
other contributions to the post-schema-validation information
set, the element is treated as if {value constraint}.{lexical
form} was used as the content of the element.
(2) Before the existing Note following that parargraph insert a
second Note:
Note: when a default value is supplied and used, as described
in the second sentence of the preceding paragraph, the
default value is used to calculate the [schema normalized
value], etc., but the actual content of the element is not
changed: the element was empty in the input information set,
and it remains empty in the PSVI.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2009 21:14:30 UTC