- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:17:34 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5023 --- Comment #14 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-04-15 16:17:34 --- >in a highly successful commercial product, XML Spy The fact that XML Spy is so successful despite its allegedly poor performance is a good reminder that as technology providers, we often over-estimate the importance of performance to our users. (However, the post you cite provides no evidence that XML Spy doesn't using hashing or indexing to support xsl:key - it seems to be pure conjecture. Such conjectures by users are often way off the mark, in my experience.) >My guess is that most XSD implementers will not bother to carefully optimize XPath expressions Depends on the dynamics of the market. In theory, if the user community needs it, they will pay for the necessary investment. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 16:17:47 UTC