- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:43:53 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4602
Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #10 from Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> 2009-04-15 15:43:53 ---
Hmm. The proposed solution comes dangerously close to preventing validation
using Notation in the context of some non-XSD specification. If, for example,
RelaxNG were to invent its own syntax for refining XSD types, might it not be
desirable to allow the same appeal to validation against Notation that is made
in XSD structures?
Noah
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:44:03 UTC