- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:00:22 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6012 --- Comment #9 from John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> 2009-04-14 15:00:22 --- (In reply to comment #7) > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b6012b.html FYI: this ends at 3.3.2.4 I was expecting it would be a diff for all changes related to this bug (possibly along with others), so SML wg members do not have to chase multiple copies. > I understand SG to be trying (against some resistance from the > spec) to use 'top-level' consistently to refer to source-level > element declarations which are children of 'schema' (or This is an improvement, thanks. The first clause appears to amount to a definition of global (and/or top-level) element declarations (e.g. the bold "global"), yet it lacks the usual [Definition: ...] markup. Suggest the usual markup should be used, and in the definition I'd suggest linking top-level and global explicitly (until the rest of the spec has been weaned of the dichotomy, which might take years)... not sure if the terms being defined are "global/top-level" or the same + "element declaration", but it seems that the definition could be factored out if you like. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:00:32 UTC