- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:23:26 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5781
--- Comment #4 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2009-04-13 17:23:26 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It would be better to recast the definition for clarity to eliminate the "is
> called", using the "the xxx is yyy" format as is used in the other three added
> or deleted definitions.
Assuming Sandy's objection is upheld, I suggest that the definition of
qualified node set be:
"[Definition:] The qualified node set is that subset of the ·target node set·
for which all the {fields} evaluate to a node sequence one of whose members is
an element or attribute node with a ·non-absent· [schema actual value]."
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 17:23:36 UTC