- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:42:20 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4602
--- Comment #8 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2009-04-13 16:42:19 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I would recast the rule as
>
> "It is an ˇerrorˇ for NOTATION to be used directly to validate a literal in
> Datatype Valid (§4.1.4), unless the literal came from the value attribute of an
> <enumeration> specified on a type derived by restriction from NOTATION. Only
> datatypes that are derived from NOTATION by specifying a value for
> ˇenumerationˇ can be used to validate other literals."
I think rather than "<enumeration>" (which is in the XML of a schema-document),
you mean "...unless the literal came from the {value} of an enumeration facet
of a simple type definition derived by restriction from NOTATION". Given that,
do we need to say something more explicitly defined than "came from"?
> Tried to find a simpler way to say the "unless" part. Suggestions welcome.
Sorry, I don't see a simpler way. Just thought we ought to stay in the schema
realm rather than talking about schema documents.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 16:42:30 UTC