- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:20:55 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4602 --- Comment #7 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-04-13 16:20:55 --- I like the simplicity of the proposal in comment #6. I find it a little strange to mention information items in this constraint (and put the general rule in parenthesis). Also when a type is derived from NOTATION by specifying an enumeration, we still need to use NOTATION to validate the literal for the enumeration. I would recast the rule as "It is an ˇerrorˇ for NOTATION to be used directly to validate a literal in Datatype Valid (§4.1.4), unless the literal came from the value attribute of an <enumeration> specified on a type derived by restriction from NOTATION. Only datatypes that are derived from NOTATION by specifying a value for ˇenumerationˇ can be used to validate other literals." Tried to find a simpler way to say the "unless" part. Suggestions welcome. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 16:21:03 UTC