- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:34:12 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6553
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|needsDrafting |needsReview
--- Comment #6 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-04-13 00:34:12 ---
A pair of wording proposals intended to resolve this issue are at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b6553.html
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b6553.html
(member-only links)
In order to keep these proposals simple and easy to evaluate, these
proposals do not attempt to address the various shortcomings and weaknesses
of our references (inconsistent bibliographic practice, misplacement of
normative references into non-normative list and vice versa). Those
weaknesses will either be addressed in a separate proposal or not at all.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 00:34:23 UTC