- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:09:07 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6043
Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pfps@research.bell-labs.com
--- Comment #3 from Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> 2008-09-24 20:09:07 ---
I don't think that I can come up with rationales for the various 16 types. The
OWL WG request is only to provide a well-known name for the particular datatype
that will be part of the the OWL spec. If the XML Schema WG decides not to add
this datatype, I expect that the OWL WG will define its own datatype, which
probably wouldn't quite be the same as the datatype defined from xsd:dateTime
by means of a pattern.
Perhaps an easier request would be to instead have a facet that explicitly
requires/forbids timezone.
Anyway, is there an expected timeline for a decision on this?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 20:09:47 UTC