- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:29:43 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5476 Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com --- Comment #2 from Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> 2008-09-23 21:29:42 --- The original bug report (from MSM, I think) reads: > We have long accepted the principle that the choice > of schema for validation should lie with the entity > requesting the validation, not with the author (when > the two are distinct). This wording tends to > undercut that principle and should be changed. I tend to agree. > For SHOULD, read MAY. I would prefer that. > Indeed, so cumbersome have I found this convention in > practice that I'm tempted to say SHOULD NOT. My vote is: probably a step too far, but I wouldn't spend time objecting if consensus is to go this way. I think we want to proceed in the spirit of the first comment quoted above, which suggests we should be neutral. Michael Kay writes: > If directed to do so, for example by the invoking > application or by command line option, processors > should attempt to dereference each schema document > location URI in the ·actual value· of such > xsi:schemaLocation and xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation > [attributes] I've never liked the "if directed to do so formulation", which I recall accepting reluctantly as a compromise in the run up to Schema 1.0. I would prefer to just say that "schemaLocaion is a hint provided by the document author to suggest where a suitable schema document might be found. Processors MAY but need not attempt to retrieve and use such schema documents and MAY but need not fail if such a retrieval attempt fails. The choice of whether to use such documents would typically determined according to the needs of the particular system or application.", or words to that effect. Noah -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 21:30:16 UTC