- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:29:43 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5476
Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> 2008-09-23 21:29:42 ---
The original bug report (from MSM, I think) reads:
> We have long accepted the principle that the choice
> of schema for validation should lie with the entity
> requesting the validation, not with the author (when
> the two are distinct). This wording tends to
> undercut that principle and should be changed.
I tend to agree.
> For SHOULD, read MAY.
I would prefer that.
> Indeed, so cumbersome have I found this convention in
> practice that I'm tempted to say SHOULD NOT.
My vote is: probably a step too far, but I wouldn't spend time objecting if
consensus is to go this way. I think we want to proceed in the spirit of the
first comment quoted above, which suggests we should be neutral.
Michael Kay writes:
> If directed to do so, for example by the invoking
> application or by command line option, processors
> should attempt to dereference each schema document
> location URI in the ·actual value· of such
> xsi:schemaLocation and xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation
> [attributes]
I've never liked the "if directed to do so formulation", which I recall
accepting reluctantly as a compromise in the run up to Schema 1.0. I would
prefer to just say that "schemaLocaion is a hint provided by the document
author to suggest where a suitable schema document might be found. Processors
MAY but need not attempt to retrieve and use such schema documents and MAY but
need not fail if such a retrieval attempt fails. The choice of whether to use
such documents would typically determined according to the needs of the
particular system or application.", or words to that effect.
Noah
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 21:30:16 UTC