- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:42:43 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6089 Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike@saxonica.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-09-16 20:42:43 --- This is surely intended as a bug against 1.0, rather than "1.0/1.1 both"? The 1.1 spec has gone completely liberal about the contents of an anyURI, stating only that it's a character string whose intended purpose is as a URI. As for XSD 1.0, I'm personally against historical revisionism, but I know that others disagree. The fact is that after 7 years, many of the implementations that exist today are stable and are not going to track every erratum to the spec anyway. The 1.0 spec for anyURI already allows implementations a fair degree of latitude, and many implementations take advantage of it. Michael Kay (personal response) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:43:16 UTC