- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:16:23 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6014
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords| |editorial
--- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> 2008-09-08 15:16:23 ---
I'm marking this as editorial, since almost all of the points raised
involve rephrasing the wording to make it clearer and eliminate apparent
contradictions.
Two points probably require special treatment: the comment on 4.2.2 and
schema composition probably should be discussed by the WG (although
speaking for myself I see little probability that the WG will be able to
do more than shrug and say "we haven't been able to clear up this dark corner
in six years of trying; we don't know any more now than we did then" and
reaffirm its decision to leave the Augean stables of schema composition
uncleansed).
The comment on 5.2 intersects with another issue I have been intending to
raise personally, and will be pointed to from that issue.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 15:16:58 UTC