- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:17:03 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5940 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-08-26 17:17:02 --- Another observation regarding Element Declarations Consistent. I think one of the objectives of this constraint is to make static type inferencing possible: if you has an element E of type T, and you are looking for a child of E called FOO, then you know what type FOO will be by examination of type T. But there is yet another situation that prevents such an inference: you can have two independent types P and Q that both extend B, and that both introduce new element particles called FOO, but that give FOO different types. So I wonder if the time has come to review whether EDC actually achieves anything useful at all? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 17:17:37 UTC