- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:41:08 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5875
David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |David_E3@VERIFONE.com
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords| |resolved
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2008-08-04 16:41:08 ---
Dear Mr. Cordell:
Thanks very much for your interest and input on our spec (this isn't
boilerplate, promise). We sincerely appreciate your comments.
The WG discussed this issue on 2008-08-01 and came to the following
conclusions:
1) the primary issue you raise is very similar to one brought out by i18n and
that is being tracked in bug 5880. The WG proposes to retire this bug (5875)
and track the alternative naming requirement in general (bug 5880).
2) the WG invites you to raise the secondary issue implied - i.e. the naming of
anonymous types - as a separate issue.
Therefore we are closing this bug as a duplicate of 5880, and deferring
discussion of the naming of anonymous types until later.
Thank you.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 5880 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 16:45:00 UTC