- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:12:44 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5675 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Keywords|needsAgreement | Resolution| |LATER --- Comment #3 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> 2008-06-13 17:12:44 --- The XML Schema Working Group discussed this issue at its teleconference of 13 June 2008. There was some support for the idea proposed, but the consensus of the group as a whole is that we cannot provide this new feature without a high cost in delay. So with some reluctance, the WG agreed to close this issue with a disposition of LATER, in the hopes of coming back to it at some future date. There was also some hope that the xs:openContent construct might at least mitigate the inconveniences mentioned in the original bug report. Fabio (and Paolo), as the originator(s) of this proposal, the WG would be grateful to you if you would consider this disposition of the issue and let us know by closing the issue that you are willing to accept the WG's decision, or by reopening it that you are dissatisfied and wish the WG to reconsider, or wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 17:13:23 UTC