- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:58:10 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5003 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Keywords|needsAgreement | Resolution| |LATER --- Comment #25 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> 2008-06-13 16:58:10 --- The XML Schema WG discussed this issue at its telcon of 13 June 2008, and noted that, as in the past, the WG has no consensus on how to resolve this issue. As a group, therefore, we agreed to close the issue with the notation LATER, in the hopes of being able to return to the topic at some future date (but as far as can be predicted this will not be in time for XSD 1.1). The W3C representative dissented, on the grounds that the correct way to resolve the issue is to do as suggested and eliminate the restriction on upward pointing references in conditional type assignement tests, or failing that to find some other way to support xml:lang and other constructs that use the same idiom. Felix, as the originator of the issue and as the representative of the i18n Core WG, we ask that you report this result back to the I18n Core WG, consider this disposition of the issue, and let us know by closing the issue or by reopening it whether you are satisfied with the XML Schema WG's efforts to resolve it and with the ultimate disposition of the issue. If we do not hear from you before the end of August, we will assume that the I18n Core WG is willing to accept this disposition and does not wish to reopen it or to appeal it to the Director. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 16:58:43 UTC