[Bug 5412] Is lax assessment required after "missing sub-component"? from bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org on 2008-05-23 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2008)

From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 23:51:46 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
CC:
Message-Id: <E1Jzh34-0004LM-1I@farnsworth.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5412


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |editorial




------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2008-05-23 23:51 -------
The initial point (discrepancy between MAY in 5.3 and MUST in 3.4.4) has
been resolved:  5.3 now uses MUST, not MAY.  (The change was part of 
the wording proposal for bug 3251.)

The remaining points appear to be clarifications rather than substantive
changes, so I am marking this bug report editorial.  (This means it may
be addressed after, rather than before, the spec goes to Last Call.)

Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 23:52:20 UTC