- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 23:23:13 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5293
cmsmcq@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Keywords|needsReview |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #11 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-05-23 23:23 -------
At its telcon today, the XML Schema WG considered the wording proposal
mentioned in comment #10. As noted, it contains two ways of resolving
the issue: adding a rule forbidding derivation of all groups from
sequences and from any but simple choices, or specifying that run-time
checking of the relevant constraint is allowed when all-groups are involved.
The WG chose the run-time checking, and instructed the editors to add a
statement that whether a processor finds the relevant errors statically
in all cases, dynamically in all cases, or sometimes one and sometimes the
other, is implementation-defined. (The exact boundary, when sometimes such
errors are found statically and sometimes only dynamically, however, is
implementation-dependent.)
The proposal has been integrated into the status-quo text with the desired
amendment, so I am marking this issue resolved.
Michael, as the originator, please indicate etc. etc. You know what to do
and you know how to do it.
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 23:23:47 UTC