Friday, 27 June 2008
Thursday, 26 June 2008
Wednesday, 25 June 2008
Tuesday, 24 June 2008
Sunday, 22 June 2008
- [Bug 5784] New: Restrictions of unions
- [Bug 5783] New: simpleType.{final} inconsistent between Part 1 and Part 2
- [Bug 5782] New: Definition of simpleType.{final}
- [Bug 5780] Identity Constraints on Complex Types with Simple Content
- [Bug 5781] New: identity constrailnt rules refer to 'node sets' - should be 'node sequences'
Saturday, 21 June 2008
- [Bug 5780] New: Identity Constraints on Complex Types with Simple Content
- [Bug 5779] New: QName resolution and xs:import
Friday, 20 June 2008
Monday, 16 June 2008
Friday, 13 June 2008
- [Bug 5250] Prefix as part of xs:QName value space
- [Bug 3245] Equality of strings
- [Bug 3260] Use of "-" in regular expressions
- [Bug 3219] Choice of XML 1.0 vs XML 1.1 datatypes
- [Bug 5731] allow internationalization of tag names in XML Schema
- [Bug 5731] allow internationalization of tag names in XML Schema
- [Bug 5726] XPath Context for Assertions must not include Element Name
- [Bug 5675] Allowing inheritance of anyAttribute when restricting
- [Bug 5674] substitution groups for attributes
- [Bug 5425] Revise Composition
- [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang
- [Bug 5748] New: Misleading title "3.4.4.4 Attribution of Elements to Particles"
- [Bug 5745] New: XML version of 1.0 Datatypes lacks necessary entity declarations
Wednesday, 4 June 2008
Tuesday, 3 June 2008
Monday, 2 June 2008
Saturday, 31 May 2008
- [Bug 5078] define required components
- [Bug 3239] Acyclicity of type derivation
- [Bug 5625] finite-length
- [Bug 5512] Definition of valid schema document is incomplete
- [Bug 5504] Annotations can vary in an extension? Why?
- [Bug 5435] The term "valid schema" is used but not defined
- [Bug 5328] Misuse of term "actual value"
- [Bug 5286] Component constraints within XML representation constraints
- [Bug 5078] define required components
- [Bug 5030] Assertions on simple types
- [Bug 3954] Indirect circularity of union and restriction should be banned
- [Bug 3239] Acyclicity of type derivation
- [Bug 3235] Acyclicity of union type definitions
- [Bug 3222] Identity and Equality
- [Bug 2047] R-181 (Structures): clarify equality and identity of lists
- [Bug 2046] R-181 (Datatypes): clarify equality and identity of lists
- equality and identity of lists in XML Schema
- [Bug 2216] R-224: Questions about metacharacters in regular expressions
- [Bug 2123] R-134: Treatment of ^ in regexes
- [Bug 1889] Regex [+-] syntax
Friday, 30 May 2008
- [Bug 5726] XPath Context for Assertions must not include Element Name
- [Bug 5726] XPath Context for Assertions must not include Element Name
- [Bug 1889] Regex [+-] syntax
- [Bug 5725] Testing sitemap.xml
- [Bug 3222] Identity and Equality
- [Bug 3235] Acyclicity of union type definitions
- [Bug 3954] Indirect circularity of union and restriction should be banned
- [Bug 4642] Terminology: zone offset versus time zone
- [Bug 4396] Note on QName considered misleading or false
- [Bug 3260] Use of "-" in regular expressions
- [Bug 2123] R-134: Treatment of ^ in regexes
- [Bug 2216] R-224: Questions about metacharacters in regular expressions
- [Bug 1889] Regex [+-] syntax
- [Bug 5625] finite-length
- [Bug 4913] Revise incomparability story to account for XPath evaluation
Thursday, 29 May 2008
- [Bug 5425] Revise Composition
- [Bug 5078] define required components
- [Bug 5425] Revise Composition
- [Bug 2067] Issue to do with identity constraints and chameleon include
- [Bug 5512] Definition of valid schema document is incomplete
- [Bug 5504] Annotations can vary in an extension? Why?
- [Bug 5286] Component constraints within XML representation constraints
- [Bug 5078] define required components
- [Bug 5030] Assertions on simple types
- [Bug 4767] New feature: xs:override
- [Bug 2577] xsi loc = redefine loc -- what happens?
- [Bug 2330] How to redefine a component in an included schema document
- [Bug 2224] R-232: Vacuous Redefinition
- [Bug 5425] Revise Composition
Wednesday, 28 May 2008
- [Bug 5435] The term "valid schema" is used but not defined
- [Bug 5435] The term "valid schema" is used but not defined
- [Bug 5435] The term "valid schema" is used but not defined
Tuesday, 27 May 2008
- [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description
- [Bug 5435] The term "valid schema" is used but not defined
- [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles
- [Bug 2067] Issue to do with identity constraints and chameleon include
Monday, 26 May 2008
Saturday, 24 May 2008
- [Bug 3264] xs:anyURI definition
- [Bug 2047] R-181 (Structures): clarify equality and identity of lists
- [Bug 5321] REs are not production nonterminals
Friday, 23 May 2008
- [Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling
- [Bug 5412] Is lax assessment required after "missing sub-component"?
- [Bug 5163] schemalocation needs to be cleaned up and clarified
- [Bug 5023] Relationship between identity constraints and assertions
- [Bug 5426] Revisit whether or allow partial XPath implementation
- [Bug 5293] Subsumption
- [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
- [Bug 5150] unclear if some prose is normative or non-normative
- [Bug 5149] normative format rfc2119 keywords used in non-normative notes
- [Bug 3243] Definition of anySimpleType
- [Bug 3227] Mapping value space to lexical space
- [Bug 3025] Lexical mappings are not necessarily functions
- [Bug 5058] anySimpleType and anyAtomicType value spaces
- [Bug 4767] New feature: xs:override
- RE: [XSCD] What is the status of XSCD? (Schema Components Designators)
- RE: [XSCD] What is the status of XSCD? (Schema Components Designators)
- Re: [XSCD] What is the status of XSCD?
- [XSCD] What is the status of XSCD?
Wednesday, 21 May 2008
- [Bug 5149] normative format rfc2119 keywords used in non-normative notes
- [Bug 5150] unclear if some prose is normative or non-normative
- [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
- [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment
- [Bug 3227] Mapping value space to lexical space
- [Bug 5058] anySimpleType and anyAtomicType value spaces
- [Bug 3243] Definition of anySimpleType
- [Bug 3025] Lexical mappings are not necessarily functions
- [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
- [Bug 5150] unclear if some prose is normative or non-normative
- [Bug 5149] normative format rfc2119 keywords used in non-normative notes
- [Bug 5293] Subsumption
Tuesday, 20 May 2008
Sunday, 18 May 2008
Friday, 16 May 2008
- [Bug 3262] base64 constraints
- [Bug 3262] base64 constraints
- [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype
- [Bug 4881] Should -NaN be allowed and given a meaning?
- [Bug 3242] "a unique namespace"
Thursday, 15 May 2008
Tuesday, 13 May 2008
Saturday, 10 May 2008
- [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
- [Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling
Friday, 9 May 2008
- [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
- [Bug 5675] Allowing inheritance of anyAttribute when restricting
- [Bug 5674] substitution groups for attributes
- [Bug 5625] finite-length
- [Bug 5486] Regex: Names of Unicode code blocks
- [Bug 5250] Prefix as part of xs:QName value space
- [Bug 5073] Use of term simple ur-type
- [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand
- [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
- [Bug 5664] Should attribute xsi:type be an allowed field in an identity constraint
- [Bug 5664] Should attribute xsi:type be an allowed field in an identity constraint
- [Bug 3262] base64 constraints
- [Bug 2046] R-181 (Datatypes): clarify equality and identity of lists
- [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
Thursday, 8 May 2008
- [Bug 3220] Terminology: "must"
- [Bug 5073] Use of term simple ur-type
- [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand
Wednesday, 7 May 2008
- [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand
- [Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling
- [Bug 5426] Revisit whether or allow partial XPath implementation
Tuesday, 6 May 2008
Monday, 5 May 2008
- [Bug 3262] base64 constraints
- [Bug 3242] "a unique namespace"
- [Bug 5585] Definition of conformance needs rework
- [Bug 5585] Definition of conformance needs rework
Sunday, 4 May 2008
Saturday, 3 May 2008
- [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand
- [Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling
- [Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling
- [Bug 3251] how to introduce primitives
Friday, 2 May 2008
- [Bug 5675] Allowing inheritance of anyAttribute when restricting
- [Bug 5675] Allowing inheritance of anyAttribute when restricting
- [Bug 5674] substitution groups for attributes
Monday, 28 April 2008
Friday, 25 April 2008
- [Bug 5664] Should attribute xsi:type be an allowed field in an identity constraint
- [Bug 5664] Should attribute xsi:type be an allowed field in an identity constraint
Saturday, 12 April 2008
- [Bug 5639] when is value V a valid restriction of value Y?
- [Bug 5639] when is value V a valid restriction of value Y?
Friday, 11 April 2008
- [Bug 5535] Definition of [nil] is wrong
- [Bug 5257] Correct references to legitimately nilled elements (ELV(E))
- [Bug 5195] Editorial comments on section 3.4.4
- [Bug 5286] Component constraints within XML representation constraints