- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:27:32 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5077 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status Whiteboard| |medium, easy ------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-12-27 00:27 ------- The spec may not be as clear on this point as it needs to be. But in fact the grammar given for the "required subset" of XPath describes the subset of XPath that serves as a kind of implementation minimum: all conforming validators must support at least that subset of XPath, more or less as all conforming processors must support decimal numbers with up to a sixteen digits of precision. Just as schemas can use more than sixteen digits in a decimal number, so also schemas can use XPath expressions that do not fall into the "required subset" of XPath. So strictly speaking I don't think there's an error here, although it seems likely that the description of the "required subset" should be made clearer.
Received on Thursday, 27 December 2007 00:27:39 UTC