- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:42:18 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5297 ------- Comment #5 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-12-07 18:42 ------- Comment #3 asks for clarification of the issue, but I cannot provide the desired clarification because I do not understand the question. The Working Group has entertained several different formulations of the spec intended to achieve the goal of ensuring that neither assertions nor conditional type assignment depend on nodes outside the subtree rooted in the item to which the assertions or conditional type assignment are attached by declaration. In some of those formulations, specific XPath axes have been made illegal in the XPath expressions. In others, the input tree has been truncated so that any expression which attempts to refer to nodes outside the subtree will evaluate to the empty set. Other formulations are possible which involve neither syntactic restrictions on XPath expressions nor tree surgery. The details of the spec prose are not of interest here; what is at issue is the goal the WG has been trying to achieve, which the description of the issue argues should be revisited. If the goal is dropped, then I think the implications for the spec prose are obvious enough.
Received on Friday, 7 December 2007 18:43:40 UTC