- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:07:37 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5297 ------- Comment #3 from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2007-12-07 01:07 ------- I agree with both Pete and Mike: we don't have to handle every use case, and there are good architectural reasons for types (and thus elements) to have context-independent validation requirements. Also: I assume I'm correct that the original bug report took a shortcut in asking for XPaths that could point up, left or right. Presumably what's wanted is that, along with relaxation of the tree trimming rules that would make such added XPath capability useful? I remain opposed, but it's certainly useful to have the proposal be clear in any case. Did I correctly infer what was intended? Thank you. Thanks. NOah
Received on Friday, 7 December 2007 01:07:45 UTC