- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:51:07 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5293 ------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-11-29 09:51 ------- >If I understand you correctly, you are proposing something similar to restriction-as-intersection Not quite. I wasn't proposing that users should be encouraged to think that its perfectly OK to define (abc?) as a restriction of (ab), with the only adverse consequence being that elements containing a c aren't valid. I was trying to find wording that says this isn't a valid restriction, but not all conformant processors will report the error.
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 09:51:12 UTC