- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:25:17 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5282 ------- Comment #1 from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2007-11-26 18:25 ------- > They are both element declaration particles > and their substitution groups overlap. I don't disagree in principle, but I see that we have a formal definition of the term "overlap" that appears in non-normative Appendix L. I think we should either use another term, or else make a suitable normative definition of "overlap", or else explain in some phrase or sentence the condition we intend. Noah
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 18:25:24 UTC