[Bug 4395] QName lexical mapping - where do the ns bindings come from?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4395





------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com  2007-11-05 19:56 -------
>users can get the
effect of the attribute-name discipline by using a union of
xsd:NCName and xsd:QName and defining the interpretation rules 
for NCNames appropriately.

This is true from the point of view of validity assessment. But if you do this
you don't end up with an xs:QName in no namespace, you end up with an
xs:NCName. If you're a QT user, there's a world of difference.

Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 19:56:34 UTC