- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:08:16 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3244
cmsmcq@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsAgreement |decided
------- Comment #9 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-10-26 22:08 -------
The XML Schema WG discussed this issue ("sets of lists") during our call of
26 October 2007. We accepted the wording proposal of comment #6 and
instructed the editors mark the issue decided. The amendment proposed in
comment #8 was considered but not accepted; the arguments mentioned were that
it's better to define atomicity with respect to values not value spaces, and
the definition offered in comment #8 seems to be a definition of primitiveness,
not atomicity.
Speaking personally, I am conscious that the latter argument also applies
(albeit less strongly, I think) to the wording we accepted, and I continue
to regard the definition of atomic value as a bit of a soft spot. If a
better formulation is found, we can and should consider it in a separate
later editorial proposal.
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 22:08:23 UTC