- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:08:16 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3244 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needsAgreement |decided ------- Comment #9 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-10-26 22:08 ------- The XML Schema WG discussed this issue ("sets of lists") during our call of 26 October 2007. We accepted the wording proposal of comment #6 and instructed the editors mark the issue decided. The amendment proposed in comment #8 was considered but not accepted; the arguments mentioned were that it's better to define atomicity with respect to values not value spaces, and the definition offered in comment #8 seems to be a definition of primitiveness, not atomicity. Speaking personally, I am conscious that the latter argument also applies (albeit less strongly, I think) to the wording we accepted, and I continue to regard the definition of atomic value as a bit of a soft spot. If a better formulation is found, we can and should consider it in a separate later editorial proposal.
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 22:08:23 UTC