- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:05:28 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5195 Summary: Editorial comments on section 3.4.4 Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org The first paragraph starts discussing the CTD of both elements and attributes, and then it seems to forget about attributes in mid-sentence and discuss elements only. It comes back to attributes about a page later, by which time it's hard to pick up the thread. (Perhaps you should take attributes first, as they are simpler.) Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) In rule 1, the use of the past tense in "did not apply" implies some kind of order of evaluation of the rules. Is the meaning different from "does not apply"? If there's a dependency here then it should be explicit, not darkly hinted at. Alternatively, factor out the rule. In rule 4, there seems to be some rogue capitalization of terms like "Attribute Use" and "Attribute Declaration". In rule 4.5, "does not match one" should be "does not match any" to avoid ambiguity.
Received on Sunday, 14 October 2007 23:05:42 UTC