- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:46:32 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3378
sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Comment #4 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2007-10-14 17:46 -------
Discussed at 2007-10-12 F2F.
Resolved: no, anyAtomicType should remain concrete. Rationale: parallelism with
anySimpleType and lack of cost in QT, since anyAtomicType is already mapped to
untypedAtomic.
Received on Sunday, 14 October 2007 17:46:45 UTC