- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:21:49 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2249 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Keywords|needsReview | Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Comment #6 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-09-24 17:21 ------- The Working Group discussed this issue during its call of 21 September (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2007Sep/0004.html) [member-only link]. On the arguments raised in comment #2 and comment #3, there was some sympathy on both sides, but we did not reach clarity or agreement on what, precisely, a health warning on this issue should say. On the point raised in comment #4 about the finiteness of strings, the WG was persuaded by arguments analogous to those in comment #5, to the effect that the finiteness of lexical representations is important for theoretical reasons, even if no finite implementation can ever recognize more than a small subset of some lexical spaces. The upshot was that the WG decided to close this issue as WORKSFORME, signaling that on further reflection we don't have agreement that there is actually a problem to solve here. I'm changing the status of the issue accordingly. It was noted that neither Paul Biron (who appears from the description to have raised the issue initially) nor Michael Kay (who has expressed a view in comment #3) was present; either of them (or anyone else, for that matter) can reopen the issue if they can provide further information that persuades the WG that there is a problem after all.
Received on Monday, 24 September 2007 17:21:56 UTC