- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:11:04 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3230 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needsReview ------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-09-21 03:11 ------- Coming back to this issue, I wonder if matters would be improved if we (a) changed the phrase "for purposes of this specification" in the first sentence of section 2.4.1.1, Atomic Datatypes, to speak instead of determining type validity, and (b) added a Note. The first sentence now reads: An ·atomic· datatype has a ·value space· consisting of a set of "atomic" values which for purposes of this specification are not further decomposable. With the changes, the section as a whole would read: 2.4.1.1 Atomic Datatypes An ·atomic· datatype has a ·value space· consisting of a set of "atomic" or elementary values. Note: Atomic values are sometimes regarded, and described, as "not decomposable", but in fact the values in several datatypes defined here do have internal structure. Except insofar as that internal structure is appealed to in checking whether particular values satisfy various constraints (e.g. upper and lower bounds on a datatype), however, that internal structure is not systematically exposed by this specification. Other specifications which use the datatypes defined here may define operations which attribute internal structure to values and expose or act upon that structure. The ·lexical space· of an ·atomic· datatype is a set of ·literals· whose internal structure is specific to the datatype in question. There is one ·special· ·atomic· datatype (anyAtomicType), and a number of ·primitive· ·atomic· datatypes which have anyAtomicType as their ·base type·. All other ·atomic· datatypes are derived either from one of the ·primitive· ·atomic· datatypes or from another ·ordinary· ·atomic· datatype. No ·user-defined· datatype may have anyAtomicType as its ·base type·. The prose from "The lexical space ..." through to the end is unchanged.
Received on Friday, 21 September 2007 03:11:10 UTC