- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:56:40 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5062 ------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-09-20 14:56 ------- Section 4.1.5 of the status-quo draft reads in part: If {variety} is union, then the applicable facets are pattern and enumeration. But it seems clear that if you looked and did not find the information you were looking for, we may need to mention it in another place. Would the definition of 'union' in 2.4.1 be an appropriate location for a recapitulation? (Perhaps a second note, after the one about what kinds of types can be member types?)
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:56:45 UTC