- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:36:29 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2947 ------- Comment #5 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-09-20 03:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=488) --> (http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=488&action=view) Shows a wording proposal of 19 September 2007 intended to resolve this issue. A wording proposal for this issue is attached as b2947.html (or will be if I get the mechanics right). The salient properties of the proposal are: 1 change the definition of 'ordered' to appeal to the table in the appendix, not to the specification of a non-trivial order. 2 de-emphasize the question of triviality vs. non-triviality; it is a possibly relevant mathematical point, not the basis of any difference between conforming and non-conforming schemas or processors, or between valid and invalid documents or values. 3 remove or recast the places where the spec currently says that an order relation is specified for all value spaces, to say that an order relation is specified for some value spaces and not for others. Owing to haste on my part, the proposal has NOT had the normal editorial review.
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 03:36:32 UTC