[Bug 3027] erroneous date example

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3027


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|decided                     |
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #8 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2007-09-18 02:56 -------
The change proposed above was approved by the WG on 30 March 2007
at its face to face meeting in Cambridge.  It is now reflected in 
the status quo version of the Datatypes spec.  Accordingly, I am 
setting the disposition of this issue to RESOLVED / FIXED.

If the originator of the issue would examine the change and let 
us know whether it satisfactorily resolves the problem or not, 
we'd be grateful.   To signal that the resolution is acceptable, 
change the status of the issue to CLOSED.  Otherwise, to signal 
that it's NOT acceptable, change the status to REOPENED (and 
tell us what's wrong).

If we don't hear from you in the next three weeks, we'll assume 
that silence betokens consent, and close the issue ourselves.   

Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 07:41:19 UTC