- From: Xan Gregg <Xan.Gregg@jmp.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:39:56 -0400
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- CC: "www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
I am happy with the resolution, seeing that pattern facet value has been updated to handle its special unioning needs. I am happy with the resolution, seeing that pattern facet value has been updated to handle its special unioning needs. xan -----Original Message----- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen [mailto:cmsmcq@acm.org] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:58 PM To: Xan Gregg Cc: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen; www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Subject: issue 2246 R-254: Clarify merge/union of facets Xan, A long time after you first raised it, the XML Schema Working Group spent some time on our telcon the other week discussing ... http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2246 R-254: Clarify merge/union of facets The result of the WG discussion is reflected in comment #7, which I reproduce below. ... This mail is to notify you formally of the resolution of the issue and to ask you to confirm that the change resolves the issue to your satisfaction (or alternatively to let us know that it does not). You can do this by responding to this email one way or the other. If we don't hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you are happy with the change.
Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 19:40:12 UTC