- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:49:54 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2246 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #7 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-09-17 18:49 ------- The XML Schema Working Group discussed this issue during its telcon of 7 September 2007. We noted that the wording of the relevant passage has changed. XSDL 1.0 and early drafts of 1.1 had {facets} The union of the set of Facets (2.4) components resolved to by the facet [children] merged with {facets} from {base type definition}, subject to the Facet Restriction Valid constraints specified in Facets (2.4). This has been changed, in the course of work on 1.1, to read {facets} The appropriate case among the following: 1. If the <restriction> alternative is chosen, then a set of Constraining Facet components constituting a restriction of the {facets} of the {base type definition} with respect to a set of Constraining Facet components corresponding to the appropriate element information items among the [children] of <restriction> (i.e. those which specify facets, if any), as defined in Schema Component Constraint: Simple Type Restriction (Facets). 2. If the <list> alternative is chosen, then a set with one member, a whiteSpace facet with {value} = collapse and {fixed} = true. 3. otherwise the empty set where 'constituting a restriction' is a hyperlink to the definition of that term in Structures. Note that both the word 'union' and the word 'merger' are now avoided. Xan Gregg, the originator of the comment, will be notified by separate email of this resolution and asked to confirm that this resolves the issue.
Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 18:50:02 UTC