- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:58:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4902
Summary: What kinds of things can conform to XSDL?
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0/1.1 both
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
The structures spec uses the verb "conform" and related
terms, including the conformance-related verbs MUST, MAY,
and SHOULD, both of software (many passages speak of
conforming processors) and of schema documents.
But the conformance section does not mention schema documents
or specify exactly what the conformance criteria for
schema documents are. It should.
The spec also uses "conformance" and related terms to
describe a sometimes bewildering array of other kinds of
thing (processing, strings, tokens) and speaks of
strings and values "conforming" to simple types (instead
of strings being members of the lexical space, and
values members of the value space, of the type). These
confusing usages should be cleared up.
A separate bug report concerns the use of conformance language
applied to XML instance documents.
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 01:58:17 UTC