- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:58:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4902 Summary: What kinds of things can conform to XSDL? Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0/1.1 both Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org The structures spec uses the verb "conform" and related terms, including the conformance-related verbs MUST, MAY, and SHOULD, both of software (many passages speak of conforming processors) and of schema documents. But the conformance section does not mention schema documents or specify exactly what the conformance criteria for schema documents are. It should. The spec also uses "conformance" and related terms to describe a sometimes bewildering array of other kinds of thing (processing, strings, tokens) and speaks of strings and values "conforming" to simple types (instead of strings being members of the lexical space, and values members of the value space, of the type). These confusing usages should be cleared up. A separate bug report concerns the use of conformance language applied to XML instance documents.
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 01:58:17 UTC