- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:29:10 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4399 ------- Comment #3 from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2007-03-21 22:29 ------- I think the proposals are OK with respect to born binary. My suggested title refers to a schema definition language. I think that can be broadly interpreted as covering both the transfer syntax and also the more abstract specification of a schema (which you refer to as born binary, though I note that our specification really just provides abstractions, not any particular binary, hex, octal, etc. representation.) Anyway, I'm usually sensitive to overlooking the components/"binary" side of things, and my antennae aren't twitching on this particular one. Noah
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 22:29:16 UTC