- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:53:46 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4399 ------- Comment #2 from davep@iit.edu 2007-03-21 14:53 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > FWIW: I'm a little more in favor of: > > Title: W3C XML Schema Definition Language > Still, I wouldn't particularly object to: > > Title: W3C XML Schema Definition Language(XSD) All well and good, for the XML language used to define these schemas. But we expect to see "born binary" schemas that are not attached to a particular defining document. Are we not drifting toward ignoring the schemas themselves? What do we call *them*? "W3C XML Schemas ("XS)"?
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 14:54:15 UTC