- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:52:51 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3817 ------- Comment #4 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-03-19 23:52 ------- For the record, the reason the editors did not propose, and WG did not consider, adding a keyword like schemaLocationHintsIgnored with the semantics described in comment # 3 is that the proposition "this process ignores schema location hints in the instance" is already expressible with the existing vocabulary defined in appendix D (specifically, as noted in comment #1, in appendix D.2.1).
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 23:52:52 UTC